FabDigitFabDigit

Cobalt-Chrome Alloy F75 vs MP159

Cobalt-Chrome Alloy · grade comparison

Cobalt-Chrome Alloy F75 and MP159 are both cobalt-chrome alloy grades. MP159 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,830 MPa (265 ksi) against 510 MPa (74 ksi) for F75, about 3.6 times as much; tensile strength follows at 1,965 MPa (285 ksi) vs 720 MPa (104 ksi). MP159 is harder — 52 HRC against 30 HRC for F75 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. F75 is stiffer (220 GPa vs 200 GPa) and F75 conducts heat better (14 W/m·K vs 11.5 W/m·K). On the shop floor, F75 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than MP159 (high, $$$$).

F75Choose it when cost is the deciding factor.

MP159Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

F75 vs MP159: properties

F75MP159

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

220 GPa31.9 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

85 GPa12.3 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

183 GPa26.5 Msi
170 GPa24.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

720 MPa104 ksi
1,965 MPa285 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

510 MPa74 ksi
1,830 MPa265 ksi

Reduction in Area

12%
38%

Compressive Strength

1,500 MPa218 ksi
1,900 MPa276 ksi

Shear Strength

500 MPa72.5 ksi
1,150 MPa167 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in
70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

300 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell C

30 HRC
52 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

320 HV
560 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.3 · Elongation at Break 10%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,330°C2,426 °F
1,315°C2,399 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,410°C2,570 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Same in both: Density 8.3 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

14 W/m·K8.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
11.5 W/m·K6.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

450 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

13 µm/m·K7.2 µin/in·°F
12.8 µm/m·K7.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

600°C1,112 °F
593°C1,099 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-253°C-423 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.9 % IACS
1.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

9.1×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.8 µΩ·in
1.02×10⁻⁶ Ω·m40.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.3 V
-0.2 V

Corrosion Resistance

87 / 100
80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
10 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

10%
8%

Weldability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
5 / 100

Castability

78 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

88 / 100
82 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb
145 MJ/kg62,339 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

11 kg CO₂/kg
10.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
20%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

87 kN·m/kg
237 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
24.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

591 kJ/m³
8,372 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.7 mm²/s
3.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every cobalt-chrome alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

5007001,0001,5002,0008.28.48.68.89Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleF75MP159

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityF75MP159
CNC machiningYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
ElectropolishingYes—
Passivation (Stainless Steel)Yes—

F75 vs MP159 — frequently asked

Is MP159 stronger than F75?

Yes. MP159 has a typical yield strength of 1,830 MPa (265 ksi) against 510 MPa (74 ksi) for F75 — about 3.6 times as much. Tensile strength is 1,965 MPa (285 ksi) vs 720 MPa (104 ksi).

Which is cheaper, F75 or MP159?

F75 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while MP159 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, F75 or MP159?

F75. Its weldability rates poor (25/100) against poor (20/100) for MP159.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in F75 and MP159 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.