FabDigitFabDigit

Cobalt-Chrome Alloy F1537 Alloy 3 vs F75

Cobalt-Chrome Alloy · grade comparison

Cobalt-Chrome Alloy F1537 Alloy 3 and F75 are both cobalt-chrome alloy grades. F1537 Alloy 3 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 930 MPa (135 ksi) against 510 MPa (74 ksi) for F75, about 82% more; tensile strength follows at 1,280 MPa (186 ksi) vs 720 MPa (104 ksi). F1537 Alloy 3 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 10% for F75, and F1537 Alloy 3 is harder (340 HB vs 300 HB). F75 runs hotter in service (600°C vs 500°C continuous). On the shop floor, F75 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than F1537 Alloy 3 (high, $$$$).

F1537 Alloy 3Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

F75Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

F1537 Alloy 3 vs F75: properties

F1537 Alloy 3F75

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

230 GPa33.4 Msi
220 GPa31.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

89 GPa12.9 Msi
85 GPa12.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

185 GPa26.8 Msi
183 GPa26.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,280 MPa186 ksi
720 MPa104 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

930 MPa135 ksi
510 MPa74 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
10%

Reduction in Area

25%
12%

Shear Strength

760 MPa110 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

620 MPa89.9 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

340 HB
300 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

36 HRC
30 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

355 HV
320 HV

Compressive Strength

—
1,500 MPa218 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,410°C2,570 °F

Same in both: Density 8.3 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,330°C2,426 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
13 µm/m·K7.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

275 J/g118 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

500°C932 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 14 W/m·K8.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 450 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2 % IACS
1.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

8.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m34.6 µΩ·in
9.1×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.8 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.3 V

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
87 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
10 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

92 / 100
88 / 100

Castability

—
78 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 12 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 10%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

170 MJ/kg73,087 BTU/lb
150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
11 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

154 kN·m/kg
87 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.7 MN·m/kg
26.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,880 kJ/m³
591 kJ/m³

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
4

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 3.7 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every cobalt-chrome alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

5007001,0001,5002,0008.28.48.68.89Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleF75F1537 Alloy 3

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityF1537 Alloy 3F75
CNC machining—Yes
3D printing—Yes
Default condition—As Cast
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Electropolishing—Yes
Passivation (Stainless Steel)—Yes

F1537 Alloy 3 vs F75 — frequently asked

Is F1537 Alloy 3 stronger than F75?

Yes. F1537 Alloy 3 has a typical yield strength of 930 MPa (135 ksi) against 510 MPa (74 ksi) for F75 — about 82% more. Tensile strength is 1,280 MPa (186 ksi) vs 720 MPa (104 ksi).

Which is cheaper, F1537 Alloy 3 or F75?

F75 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while F1537 Alloy 3 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, F1537 Alloy 3 or F75?

F1537 Alloy 3. Its weldability rates poor (30/100) against poor (25/100) for F75.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in F1537 Alloy 3 and F75 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.