FabDigitFabDigit

Cobalt-Chrome Alloy F75 vs F90

Cobalt-Chrome Alloy · grade comparison

Cobalt-Chrome Alloy F75 and F90 are both cobalt-chrome alloy grades, both biomedical cocr. F75 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 510 MPa (74 ksi) against 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) for F90, about 11% more. In exchange, F90 is the more ductile: elongation 55% versus 10% for F75, and F75 is harder (300 HB vs 240 HB). F75 is lighter (8.3 g/cm³ vs 9.13 g/cm³ for F90) and F90 runs hotter in service (980°C vs 600°C continuous). On the shop floor, F90 welds better (very good vs poor) and F75 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than F90 (specialty, $$$$$).

F75Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

F90Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

F75 vs F90: properties

F75F90

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

220 GPa31.9 Msi
225 GPa32.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

85 GPa12.3 Msi
87 GPa12.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

183 GPa26.5 Msi
180 GPa26.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

720 MPa104 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

510 MPa74 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
55%

Reduction in Area

12%
50%

Compressive Strength

1,500 MPa218 ksi
—

Shear Strength

500 MPa72.5 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in
100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
80 J59 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

300 HB
240 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

30 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

320 HV
250 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
96 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.3 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³
9.13 g/cm³0.33 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,330°C2,426 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,410°C2,570 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

14 W/m·K8.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
9.6 W/m·K5.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

450 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

13 µm/m·K7.2 µin/in·°F
12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
280 J/g120 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

600°C1,112 °F
980°C1,796 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

9.1×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.8 µΩ·in
8.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 1.9 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.3 V
-0.18 V

Corrosion Resistance

87 / 100
84 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
16 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

10%
12%

Weldability

25 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

78 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 88 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb
250 MJ/kg107,481 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

11 kg CO₂/kg
18 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

87 kN·m/kg
110 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
24.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

591 kJ/m³
470 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.7 mm²/s
2.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every cobalt-chrome alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

5007001,0001,5002,0008.28.48.68.89Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleF75F90

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityF75F90
3D printingYes—
Sheet metal—Yes
Default conditionAs CastSolution Annealed
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 2 finishes: Electropolishing, Passivation (Stainless Steel).

F75 vs F90 — frequently asked

Is F75 stronger than F90?

Yes. F75 has a typical yield strength of 510 MPa (74 ksi) against 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) for F90 — about 11% more. Tensile strength is 720 MPa (104 ksi) vs 1,000 MPa (145 ksi).

Which is cheaper, F75 or F90?

F75 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while F90 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, F75 or F90?

F90. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against poor (25/100) for F75.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in F75 and F90 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.