FabDigitFabDigit

MgO Ceramic vs MgTiO3

Ceramic · grade comparison

MgO Ceramic and MgTiO3 are both ceramic grades. MgO Ceramic is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for MgTiO3, about 43% more. MgTiO3 is harder — 700 HV against 620 HV for MgO Ceramic — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. MgO Ceramic is lighter (3.55 g/cm³ vs 3.8 g/cm³ for MgTiO3) and MgO Ceramic is stiffer (300 GPa vs 150 GPa). On the shop floor, MgO Ceramic machines more easily (poor vs not recommended) and MgO Ceramic sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than MgTiO3 (high, $$$$).

MgO CeramicChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

MgTiO3Choose it when surface hardness matters.

MgO Ceramic vs MgTiO3: properties

MgO CeramicMgTiO3

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

300 GPa43.5 Msi
150 GPa21.8 Msi

Shear Modulus

128 GPa18.6 Msi
60 GPa8.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

155 GPa22.5 Msi
100 GPa14.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.18
0.25

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Compressive Strength

1,000 MPa145 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Flexural Strength

170 MPa24.7 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

1.6 MPa·√m1.5 ksi·√in
1.5 MPa·√m1.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

620 HV
700 HV

Hardness, Knoop

590 HK
650 HK

Elongation at Break

—
0%

Same in both: Hardness, Mohs 6

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

3.55 g/cm³0.13 lb/in³
3.8 g/cm³0.14 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,800°C5,072 °F
1,630°C2,966 °F

Refractive Index

1.736
—

Porosity

2%
0.5%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
4.5 W/m·K2.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

935 J/kg·K0.22 BTU/lb·°F
700 J/kg·K0.17 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

13.5 µm/m·K7.5 µin/in·°F
7.5 µm/m·K4.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,700°C3,092 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

9.7
16.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

4×10⁻⁴
2×10⁻⁴

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 12 kV/mm305 V/mil · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
5 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
75 / 100

Sintering / Firing Temperature

1,700°C3,092 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

40 MJ/kg17,197 BTU/lb
65 MJ/kg27,945 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3 kg CO₂/kg
5.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

25 L/kg3 gal/lb
150 L/kg18 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

28 kN·m/kg
18 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

84.5 MN·m/kg
39.5 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

12.1 mm²/s
1.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

1
0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every ceramic grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,000234567Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMgO CeramicMgTiO3
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

MgO Ceramic vs MgTiO3 — frequently asked

Is MgO Ceramic stronger than MgTiO3?

Yes. MgO Ceramic has a typical tensile strength of 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for MgTiO3 — about 43% more.

Which is cheaper, MgO Ceramic or MgTiO3?

MgO Ceramic is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while MgTiO3 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, MgO Ceramic or MgTiO3?

MgO Ceramic. Its machinability rates poor (22/100) against not recommended (5/100) for MgTiO3.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in MgO Ceramic and MgTiO3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.