FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum AC3A vs ADC10

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum AC3A and ADC10 are both aluminum grades. ADC10 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 160 MPa (23.2 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for AC3A, about 113% more; tensile strength follows at 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi). In exchange, AC3A is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 3% for ADC10, and ADC10 is harder (80 HB vs 50 HB). AC3A is lighter (2.66 g/cm³ vs 2.76 g/cm³ for ADC10) and AC3A conducts heat better (130 W/m·K vs 96 W/m·K). On the shop floor, ADC10 machines more easily (very good vs fair) and AC3A welds better (very good vs poor).

AC3AChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

ADC10Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

AC3A vs ADC10: properties

AC3AADC10

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

165 MPa23.9 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

6%
3%

Shear Strength

115 MPa16.7 ksi
185 MPa26.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

55 MPa8 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in
18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

3 J2.2 ft·lbf
4 J3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

50 HB
80 HB

Compressive Strength

—
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Hardness, Vickers

—
85 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Shear Modulus 26.5 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.66 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.76 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

574°C1,065 °F
540°C1,004 °F

Liquidus Temperature

582°C1,080 °F
595°C1,103 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
96 W/m·K55.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F
21.8 µm/m·K12.1 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-80°C-112 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

33 % IACS
23 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in
7.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.95 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.76 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
42 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
75 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
260%

Weldability

80 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

95 / 100
92 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 10 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
85%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
116 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.7 MN·m/kg
25.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

40 kJ/m³
180 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

50.7 mm²/s
36.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

15
20

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAC3AADC10

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAC3AADC10
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

AC3A vs ADC10 — frequently asked

Is ADC10 stronger than AC3A?

Yes. ADC10 has a typical yield strength of 160 MPa (23.2 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for AC3A — about 113% more. Tensile strength is 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AC3A or ADC10?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, AC3A or ADC10?

ADC10. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against fair (40/100) for AC3A; for welding the order is AC3A first (very good, 80/100) then ADC10 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AC3A and ADC10 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.