FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum AC3A vs AC8C

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum AC3A and AC8C are both aluminum grades. AC8C is the stronger of the two: yield strength 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for AC3A, about 3.3 times as much; tensile strength follows at 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi). In exchange, AC3A is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 0.8% for AC8C, and AC8C is harder (110 HB vs 50 HB). AC8C is stiffer (80 GPa vs 71 GPa) and AC8C runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, AC8C machines more easily (good vs fair) and AC3A welds better (very good vs poor).

AC3AChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

AC8CChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

AC3A vs AC8C: properties

AC3AAC8C

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
30 GPa4.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

165 MPa23.9 ksi
285 MPa41.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

6%
0.8%

Shear Strength

115 MPa16.7 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

55 MPa8 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in
16 MPa·√m14.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

3 J2.2 ft·lbf
2 J1.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

50 HB
110 HB

Compressive Strength

—
265 MPa38.4 ksi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.66 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.74 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

574°C1,065 °F
520°C968 °F

Liquidus Temperature

582°C1,080 °F
590°C1,094 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
110 W/m·K63.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

33 % IACS
24 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.83 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.8 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
42 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
60 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
60%

Weldability

80 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
5 / 100

Castability

95 / 100
82 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
55%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
104 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.7 MN·m/kg
29.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

40 kJ/m³
391 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

50.7 mm²/s
44.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

15
19

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAC3AAC8C

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAC3AAC8C
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

AC3A vs AC8C — frequently asked

Is AC8C stronger than AC3A?

Yes. AC8C has a typical yield strength of 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for AC3A — about 3.3 times as much. Tensile strength is 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AC3A or AC8C?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, AC3A or AC8C?

AC8C. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (40/100) for AC3A; for welding the order is AC3A first (very good, 80/100) then AC8C (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AC3A and AC8C side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.