FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum AC3A vs AC7A

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum AC3A and AC7A are both aluminum grades. AC7A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 85 MPa (12.3 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for AC3A, about 13% more. AC7A is the more ductile: elongation 9% versus 6% for AC3A. AC3A runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous). On the shop floor, AC7A machines more easily (very good vs fair).

AC3AChoose it when the part sees heat.

AC7AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

AC3A vs AC7A: properties

AC3AAC7A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

165 MPa23.9 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

6%
9%

Shear Strength

115 MPa16.7 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

55 MPa8 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

3 J2.2 ft·lbf
12 J8.9 ft·lbf

Compressive Strength

—
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Shear Modulus 26.5 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Hardness, Brinell 50 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.66 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.65 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

574°C1,065 °F
599°C1,110 °F

Liquidus Temperature

582°C1,080 °F
638°C1,180 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
138 W/m·K79.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F
24.3 µm/m·K13.5 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

33 % IACS
35 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in
4.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.93 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.87 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
110%

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
—

Castability

95 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
90 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
55%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
64 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.7 MN·m/kg
26.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

40 kJ/m³
51 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

50.7 mm²/s
57.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

15
14

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAC3AAC7A

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAC3AAC7A
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

AC3A vs AC7A — frequently asked

Is AC7A stronger than AC3A?

Yes. AC7A has a typical yield strength of 85 MPa (12.3 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for AC3A — about 13% more. Tensile strength is 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AC3A or AC7A?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, AC3A or AC7A?

AC7A. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against fair (40/100) for AC3A.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AC3A and AC7A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.