FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 7075 vs 7N01

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 7075 and 7N01 are both aluminum grades. 7075 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 503 MPa (73 ksi) against 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) for 7N01, about 76% more; tensile strength follows at 572 MPa (83 ksi) vs 355 MPa (51.5 ksi). In exchange, 7N01 is the more ductile: elongation 13% versus 11% for 7075, and 7075 is harder (150 HB vs 105 HB). On the shop floor, 7075 machines more easily (very good vs good) and 7N01 welds better (very good vs poor).

7075Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

7N01Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

7075 vs 7N01: properties

70757N01

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71.7 GPa10.4 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.9 GPa3.9 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

572 MPa83 ksi
355 MPa51.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

503 MPa73 ksi
285 MPa41.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
13%

Reduction in Area

25%
—

Compressive Strength

505 MPa73.2 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Shear Strength

331 MPa48 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

159 MPa23.1 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

27 MPa·√m24.6 ksi·√in
33 MPa·√m30 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

8 J5.9 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
105 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

87 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

175 HV
112 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.81 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.78 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

477°C891 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Liquidus Temperature

635°C1,175 °F
645°C1,193 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
140 W/m·K80.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

960 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

395 J/g170 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 120°C248 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

33 % IACS
35 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.15×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.03 µΩ·in
4.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.93 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.84 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
48 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

78 / 100
62 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

160%
60%

Weldability

18 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

10 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

—
20 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

15%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

204 kN·m/kg
128 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
25.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,764 kJ/m³
580 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

48.2 mm²/s
56 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

44
30

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale70757N01

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability70757N01
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionT6—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

7075 vs 7N01 — frequently asked

Is 7075 stronger than 7N01?

Yes. 7075 has a typical yield strength of 503 MPa (73 ksi) against 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) for 7N01 — about 76% more. Tensile strength is 572 MPa (83 ksi) vs 355 MPa (51.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 7075 or 7N01?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 7075 or 7N01?

7075. Its machinability rates very good (78/100) against good (62/100) for 7N01; for welding the order is 7N01 first (very good, 80/100) then 7075 (poor, 18/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 7075 and 7N01 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.