FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 7012 vs 7075

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 7012 and 7075 are both aluminum grades, both high strength al. Both yield at about 510 MPa — strength does not separate them. 7075 is the more ductile: elongation 11% versus 9% for 7012, and 7012 is harder (160 HB vs 150 HB).

7075Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

7012 vs 7075: properties

70127075

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
71.7 GPa10.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
572 MPa83 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

510 MPa74 ksi
503 MPa73 ksi

Elongation at Break

9%
11%

Compressive Strength

520 MPa75.4 ksi
505 MPa73.2 ksi

Shear Strength

325 MPa47.1 ksi
331 MPa48 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

155 MPa22.5 ksi
159 MPa23.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

28 MPa·√m25.5 ksi·√in
27 MPa·√m24.6 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

160 HB
150 HB

Hardness, Vickers

170 HV
175 HV

Reduction in Area

—
25%

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
8 J5.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
87 HRB

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26.9 GPa3.9 Msi · Bulk Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

480°C896 °F
477°C891 °F

Same in both: Density 2.81 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 635°C1,175 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

135 W/m·K78 BTU/hr·ft·°F
130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

865 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
960 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F
23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

385 J/g166 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 120°C248 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

32 % IACS
33 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.13 µΩ·in
5.15×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.03 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.84 V
-0.83 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
78 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
160%

Weldability

22 / 100
18 / 100

Formability (cold)

22 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 10 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
15%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

196 kN·m/kg
204 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.3 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,832 kJ/m³
1,764 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

55.5 mm²/s
48.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

45
44

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale70127075

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability70127075
Default condition—T6
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

7012 vs 7075 — frequently asked

What is the difference between 7012 and 7075?

Aluminum 7012 and 7075 are both aluminum grades, both high strength al. Both yield at about 510 MPa — strength does not separate them. 7075 is the more ductile: elongation 11% versus 9% for 7012, and 7012 is harder (160 HB vs 150 HB).

Which is cheaper, 7012 or 7075?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 7012 or 7075?

7075, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 78/100 against 72/100 for 7012.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 7012 and 7075 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.