FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 7075 vs 7475

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 7075 and 7475 are both aluminum grades. 7075 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 503 MPa (73 ksi) against 421 MPa (61.1 ksi) for 7475, about 19% more; tensile strength follows at 572 MPa (83 ksi) vs 490 MPa (71.1 ksi). In exchange, 7475 is the more ductile: elongation 13% versus 11% for 7075, and 7075 is harder (150 HB vs 135 HB). 7475 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous) and 7475 conducts heat better (163 W/m·K vs 130 W/m·K).

7075Choose it when strength drives the design.

7475Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

7075 vs 7475: properties

70757475

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71.7 GPa10.4 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.9 GPa3.9 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

572 MPa83 ksi
490 MPa71.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

503 MPa73 ksi
421 MPa61.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
13%

Reduction in Area

25%
—

Compressive Strength

505 MPa73.2 ksi
428 MPa62.1 ksi

Shear Strength

331 MPa48 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

159 MPa23.1 ksi
152 MPa22 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

27 MPa·√m24.6 ksi·√in
66 MPa·√m60.1 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

8 J5.9 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
135 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

87 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

175 HV
—

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 2.81 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 477°C891 °F · Liquidus Temperature 635°C1,175 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
163 W/m·K94.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

960 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
864 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
22.7 µm/m·K12.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

395 J/g170 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

33 % IACS
40 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.15×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.03 µΩ·in
4.31×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.82 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
50 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

78 / 100
72 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

160%
70%

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Castability

—
20 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 18 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 10 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
12%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

204 kN·m/kg
174 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
25.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,764 kJ/m³
1,248 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

48.2 mm²/s
67.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

44
50

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale70757475

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability70757475
Default conditionT6—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

7075 vs 7475 — frequently asked

Is 7075 stronger than 7475?

Yes. 7075 has a typical yield strength of 503 MPa (73 ksi) against 421 MPa (61.1 ksi) for 7475 — about 19% more. Tensile strength is 572 MPa (83 ksi) vs 490 MPa (71.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 7075 or 7475?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 7075 or 7475?

7075, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 78/100 against 72/100 for 7475.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 7075 and 7475 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.