FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 7075 vs 7095

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 7075 and 7095 are both aluminum grades. 7095 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 675 MPa (97.9 ksi) against 503 MPa (73 ksi) for 7075, about 34% more; tensile strength follows at 710 MPa (103 ksi) vs 572 MPa (83 ksi). 7095 is harder — 190 HB against 150 HB for 7075 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. On the shop floor, 7075 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than 7095 (high, $$$$).

7075Choose it when cost is the deciding factor.

7095Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

7075 vs 7095: properties

70757095

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71.7 GPa10.4 Msi
71.5 GPa10.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.9 GPa3.9 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
74 GPa10.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

572 MPa83 ksi
710 MPa103 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

503 MPa73 ksi
675 MPa97.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
10%

Reduction in Area

25%
20%

Compressive Strength

505 MPa73.2 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Shear Strength

331 MPa48 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

159 MPa23.1 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

27 MPa·√m24.6 ksi·√in
30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

8 J5.9 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
190 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

87 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

175 HV
205 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.81 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.86 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

477°C891 °F
470°C878 °F

Liquidus Temperature

635°C1,175 °F
630°C1,166 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
135 W/m·K78 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

960 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
870 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

395 J/g170 BTU/lb
385 J/g166 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 120°C248 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

33 % IACS
31 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.15×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.03 µΩ·in
5.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.84 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

78 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

160%
70%

Weldability

18 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

—
20 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 10 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
215 MJ/kg92,433 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
13 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

204 kN·m/kg
248 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
25 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,764 kJ/m³
3,186 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

48.2 mm²/s
54.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

44
57

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale70757095

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability70757095
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionT6—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

7075 vs 7095 — frequently asked

Is 7095 stronger than 7075?

Yes. 7095 has a typical yield strength of 675 MPa (97.9 ksi) against 503 MPa (73 ksi) for 7075 — about 34% more. Tensile strength is 710 MPa (103 ksi) vs 572 MPa (83 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 7075 or 7095?

7075 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 7095 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 7075 or 7095?

7075, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 78/100 against 70/100 for 7095.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 7075 and 7095 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.