FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 7075 vs 7085

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 7075 and 7085 are both aluminum grades. 7075 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 503 MPa (73 ksi) against 469 MPa (68 ksi) for 7085, about 7% more; tensile strength follows at 572 MPa (83 ksi) vs 505 MPa (73.2 ksi). 7085 conducts heat better (152 W/m·K vs 130 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 7075 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than 7085 (high, $$$$).

7075Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

7075 vs 7085: properties

70757085

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71.7 GPa10.4 Msi
70.5 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

572 MPa83 ksi
505 MPa73.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

503 MPa73 ksi
469 MPa68 ksi

Reduction in Area

25%
22%

Compressive Strength

505 MPa73.2 ksi
483 MPa70.1 ksi

Shear Strength

331 MPa48 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

159 MPa23.1 ksi
155 MPa22.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

27 MPa·√m24.6 ksi·√in
38 MPa·√m34.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

8 J5.9 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

87 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

175 HV
—

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26.9 GPa3.9 Msi · Bulk Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 11% · Hardness, Brinell 150 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.81 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.85 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 477°C891 °F · Liquidus Temperature 635°C1,175 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
152 W/m·K87.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

960 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
860 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

395 J/g170 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 120°C248 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

33 % IACS
41 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.15×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.03 µΩ·in
4.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.65 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.84 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
50 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

78 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

160%
70%

Weldability

18 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

—
35 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 25 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 10 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

15%
8%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

204 kN·m/kg
177 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
24.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,764 kJ/m³
1,560 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

48.2 mm²/s
62 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

44
47

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale70757085

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability70757085
Default conditionT6T7451
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

7075 vs 7085 — frequently asked

Is 7075 stronger than 7085?

Yes. 7075 has a typical yield strength of 503 MPa (73 ksi) against 469 MPa (68 ksi) for 7085 — about 7% more. Tensile strength is 572 MPa (83 ksi) vs 505 MPa (73.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 7075 or 7085?

7075 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 7085 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 7075 or 7085?

7075, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 78/100 against 70/100 for 7085.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 7075 and 7085 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.