FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 7050 vs 7075

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 7050 and 7075 are both aluminum grades. 7075 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 503 MPa (73 ksi) against 469 MPa (68 ksi) for 7050, about 7% more; tensile strength follows at 572 MPa (83 ksi) vs 524 MPa (76 ksi). 7075 is harder — 150 HB against 140 HB for 7050 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 7050 conducts heat better (157 W/m·K vs 130 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 7075 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than 7050 (high, $$$$).

7075Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

7050 vs 7075: properties

70507075

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

524 MPa76 ksi
572 MPa83 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

469 MPa68 ksi
503 MPa73 ksi

Compressive Strength

476 MPa69 ksi
505 MPa73.2 ksi

Shear Strength

305 MPa44.2 ksi
331 MPa48 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
159 MPa23.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

36 MPa·√m32.8 ksi·√in
27 MPa·√m24.6 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

140 HB
150 HB

Reduction in Area

—
25%

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
8 J5.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
87 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
175 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 71.7 GPa10.4 Msi · Shear Modulus 26.9 GPa3.9 Msi · Bulk Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 11%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.83 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.81 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

488°C910 °F
477°C891 °F

Liquidus Temperature

630°C1,166 °F
635°C1,175 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

157 W/m·K90.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

860 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
960 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.5 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

385 J/g166 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 120°C248 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

40.5 % IACS
33 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.26×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.68 µΩ·in
5.15×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.03 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.84 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

42 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
78 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

80%
160%

Formability (cold)

22 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

15 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 18 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

20%
15%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

185 kN·m/kg
204 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.3 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,534 kJ/m³
1,764 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

64.5 mm²/s
48.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

49
44

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale70757050

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability70507075
Default condition—T6
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

7050 vs 7075 — frequently asked

Is 7075 stronger than 7050?

Yes. 7075 has a typical yield strength of 503 MPa (73 ksi) against 469 MPa (68 ksi) for 7050 — about 7% more. Tensile strength is 572 MPa (83 ksi) vs 524 MPa (76 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 7050 or 7075?

7075 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 7050 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 7050 or 7075?

7075, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 78/100 against 72/100 for 7050.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 7050 and 7075 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.