FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 7020 vs 7021

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 7020 and 7021 are both aluminum grades, both high strength al. 7021 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) against 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) for 7020, about 9% more; tensile strength follows at 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) vs 385 MPa (55.8 ksi). 7021 is harder — 135 HV against 128 HV for 7020 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 7021 conducts heat better (140 W/m·K vs 125 W/m·K).

7021Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

7020 vs 7021: properties

70207021

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

26.4 GPa3.8 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

385 MPa55.8 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

340 MPa49.3 ksi
370 MPa53.7 ksi

Compressive Strength

345 MPa50 ksi
375 MPa54.4 ksi

Shear Strength

215 MPa31.2 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

140 MPa20.3 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

32 MPa·√m29.1 ksi·√in
30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

120 HB
125 HB

Hardness, Vickers

128 HV
135 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 12%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

605°C1,121 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Liquidus Temperature

650°C1,202 °F
645°C1,193 °F

Same in both: Density 2.78 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

125 W/m·K72.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
140 W/m·K80.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

875 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.1 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 120°C248 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

32 % IACS
33 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.13 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.84 V
-0.85 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
62 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
70%

Weldability

78 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
35 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
—

Polishability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 20 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

138 kN·m/kg
149 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

826 kJ/m³
978 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

51.4 mm²/s
57.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

30
35

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.2 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale70207021

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability70207021
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

7020 vs 7021 — frequently asked

Is 7021 stronger than 7020?

Yes. 7021 has a typical yield strength of 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) against 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) for 7020 — about 9% more. Tensile strength is 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) vs 385 MPa (55.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 7020 or 7021?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 7020 or 7021?

7021, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 62/100 against 55/100 for 7020; for welding the order is 7020 first (very good, 78/100) then 7021 (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 7020 and 7021 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.