FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6060 vs 6351

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6060 and 6351 are both aluminum grades, both multipurpose al. 6351 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 6060, about 68% more; tensile strength follows at 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). 6351 is the more ductile: elongation 14% versus 12% for 6060, and 6351 is harder (95 HB vs 75 HB). 6060 conducts heat better (200 W/m·K vs 176 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 6060 welds better (excellent vs very good).

6060Choose it when it will be welded.

6351Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

6060 vs 6351: properties

60606351

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

215 MPa31.2 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
285 MPa41.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
14%

Shear Strength

140 MPa20.3 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in
29 MPa·√m26.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

75 HB
95 HB

Hardness, Vickers

80 HV
105 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

600°C1,112 °F
555°C1,031 °F

Liquidus Temperature

655°C1,211 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
176 W/m·K102 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

898 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
895 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

54 % IACS
44 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.26 µΩ·in
3.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.54 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.74 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
62 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
78 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
190%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

80 kN·m/kg
114 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

209 kJ/m³
589 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

82.5 mm²/s
72.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

27
34

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale60606351

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60606351
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

6060 vs 6351 — frequently asked

Is 6351 stronger than 6060?

Yes. 6351 has a typical yield strength of 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 6060 — about 68% more. Tensile strength is 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6060 or 6351?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 6060 or 6351?

6351, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 62/100 against 55/100 for 6060; for welding the order is 6060 first (excellent, 90/100) then 6351 (very good, 78/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6060 and 6351 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.