FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6005A vs 6351

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6005A and 6351 are both aluminum grades, both multipurpose al. 6351 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) against 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) for 6005A, about 21% more; tensile strength follows at 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi). 6351 is the more ductile: elongation 14% versus 11% for 6005A. 6005A conducts electricity better (49 % IACS vs 44 % IACS).

6351Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

6005A vs 6351: properties

6005A6351

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69.5 GPa10.1 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

235 MPa34.1 ksi
285 MPa41.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
14%

Compressive Strength

235 MPa34.1 ksi
—

Shear Strength

180 MPa26.1 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

18 J13.3 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Vickers

100 HV
105 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 90 MPa13.1 ksi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 29 MPa·√m26.4 ksi·√in · Hardness, Brinell 95 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

607°C1,125 °F
555°C1,031 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

190 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F
176 W/m·K102 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

897 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
895 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

393 J/g169 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

49 % IACS
44 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.38 µΩ·in
3.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.54 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.74 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

85 / 100
78 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 62 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 190% · Brazeability / Solderability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

102 kN·m/kg
114 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.7 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

397 kJ/m³
589 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

78.5 mm²/s
72.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

33
34

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale6005A6351

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability6005A6351
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

6005A vs 6351 — frequently asked

Is 6351 stronger than 6005A?

Yes. 6351 has a typical yield strength of 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) against 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) for 6005A — about 21% more. Tensile strength is 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6005A or 6351?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 6005A or 6351?

6005A. Its weldability rates excellent (85/100) against very good (78/100) for 6351.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6005A and 6351 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.