FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6005A vs 6060

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6005A and 6060 are both aluminum grades, both multipurpose al. 6005A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 6060, about 38% more; tensile strength follows at 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). 6005A is harder — 95 HB against 75 HB for 6060 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. On the shop floor, 6060 forms better (good vs fair).

6005AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

6005A vs 6060: properties

6005A6060

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69.5 GPa10.1 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

235 MPa34.1 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
12%

Compressive Strength

235 MPa34.1 ksi
—

Shear Strength

180 MPa26.1 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

29 MPa·√m26.4 ksi·√in
30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

18 J13.3 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

95 HB
75 HB

Hardness, Vickers

100 HV
80 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

607°C1,125 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
655°C1,211 °F

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

190 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F
200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

897 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
898 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

393 J/g169 BTU/lb
397 J/g171 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

49 % IACS
54 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.38 µΩ·in
3.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.26 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.83 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

190%
—

Weldability

85 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: Castability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
13 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

30%
35%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

102 kN·m/kg
80 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.7 MN·m/kg
25.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

397 kJ/m³
209 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

78.5 mm²/s
82.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

33
27

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale6005A6060

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability6005A6060
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

6005A vs 6060 — frequently asked

Is 6005A stronger than 6060?

Yes. 6005A has a typical yield strength of 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 6060 — about 38% more. Tensile strength is 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6005A or 6060?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 6005A or 6060?

6005A, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 62/100 against 55/100 for 6060; for welding the order is 6060 first (excellent, 90/100) then 6005A (excellent, 85/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6005A and 6060 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.