FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6060 vs 6151

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6060 and 6151 are both aluminum grades. 6151 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 6060, about 74% more; tensile strength follows at 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). 6151 is the more ductile: elongation 17% versus 12% for 6060, and 6151 is harder (100 HB vs 75 HB). 6060 conducts heat better (200 W/m·K vs 175 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 6151 machines more easily (65 vs 55 out of 100), 6060 welds better (excellent vs very good), and 6060 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 6151 (standard, $$).

6060Choose it when it will be welded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

6151Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

6060 vs 6151: properties

60606151

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

215 MPa31.2 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
295 MPa42.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
17%

Shear Strength

140 MPa20.3 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

75 HB
100 HB

Hardness, Vickers

80 HV
107 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
60 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

600°C1,112 °F
588°C1,090 °F

Liquidus Temperature

655°C1,211 °F
649°C1,200 °F

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
175 W/m·K101 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

898 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
895 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F
23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
393 J/g169 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

54 % IACS
43 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.26 µΩ·in
4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.57 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.83 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
35 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
60 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
50%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

80 kN·m/kg
122 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

209 kJ/m³
631 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

82.5 mm²/s
72.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

27
36

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.6 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale60606151

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60606151
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

6060 vs 6151 — frequently asked

Is 6151 stronger than 6060?

Yes. 6151 has a typical yield strength of 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 6060 — about 74% more. Tensile strength is 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6060 or 6151?

6060 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 6151 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 6060 or 6151?

6151, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 55/100 for 6060; for welding the order is 6060 first (excellent, 90/100) then 6151 (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6060 and 6151 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.