FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6005 vs 6151

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6005 and 6151 are both aluminum grades. 6151 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) against 245 MPa (35.5 ksi) for 6005, about 20% more; tensile strength follows at 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 270 MPa (39.2 ksi). 6151 is the more ductile: elongation 17% versus 11% for 6005, and 6151 is harder (100 HB vs 85 HB). 6005 conducts electricity better (49 % IACS vs 43 % IACS). On the shop floor, 6151 machines more easily (65 vs 55 out of 100) and 6005 welds better (80 vs 70 out of 100).

6005Choose it when it will be welded.

6151Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

6005 vs 6151: properties

60056151

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

270 MPa39.2 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

245 MPa35.5 ksi
295 MPa42.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
17%

Shear Strength

172 MPa24.9 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
100 HB

Hardness, Vickers

90 HV
107 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
60 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

607°C1,125 °F
588°C1,090 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
649°C1,200 °F

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

188 W/m·K109 BTU/hr·ft·°F
175 W/m·K101 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

897 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
895 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F
23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
393 J/g169 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

49 % IACS
43 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.52×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.39 µΩ·in
4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.57 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.83 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

—
40 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 50%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

100 kN·m/kg
122 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

435 kJ/m³
631 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

77.6 mm²/s
72.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

31
36

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.6 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale60056151

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60056151
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

6005 vs 6151 — frequently asked

Is 6151 stronger than 6005?

Yes. 6151 has a typical yield strength of 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) against 245 MPa (35.5 ksi) for 6005 — about 20% more. Tensile strength is 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 270 MPa (39.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6005 or 6151?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 6005 or 6151?

6151, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 55/100 for 6005; for welding the order is 6005 first (very good, 80/100) then 6151 (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6005 and 6151 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.