FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6060 vs 6081

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6060 and 6081 are both aluminum grades, both multipurpose al. 6081 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 6060, about 62% more; tensile strength follows at 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). 6081 is harder — 95 HB against 75 HB for 6060 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 6060 conducts heat better (200 W/m·K vs 170 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 6060 welds better (excellent vs very good) and 6060 forms better (good vs fair).

6060Choose it when it will be welded.

6081Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

6060 vs 6081: properties

60606081

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

215 MPa31.2 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
11%

Shear Strength

140 MPa20.3 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in
29 MPa·√m26.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

75 HB
95 HB

Hardness, Vickers

80 HV
100 HV

Compressive Strength

—
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

600°C1,112 °F
585°C1,085 °F

Liquidus Temperature

655°C1,211 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
170 W/m·K98.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

898 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

54 % IACS
42 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.26 µΩ·in
4.1×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.61 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.83 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
78 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
40 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
65 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
150%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

80 kN·m/kg
115 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

209 kJ/m³
548 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

82.5 mm²/s
70 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

27
33

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.6 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale60606081

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60606081
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

6060 vs 6081 — frequently asked

Is 6081 stronger than 6060?

Yes. 6081 has a typical yield strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 6060 — about 62% more. Tensile strength is 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6060 or 6081?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 6060 or 6081?

6081, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 60/100 against 55/100 for 6060; for welding the order is 6060 first (excellent, 90/100) then 6081 (very good, 78/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6060 and 6081 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.