FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6005 vs 6201

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6005 and 6201 are both aluminum grades. 6201 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 245 MPa (35.5 ksi) for 6005, about 27% more; tensile strength follows at 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 270 MPa (39.2 ksi). In exchange, 6005 is the more ductile: elongation 11% versus 4% for 6201, and 6201 is harder (100 HB vs 85 HB). 6005 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 90°C continuous). On the shop floor, 6201 machines more easily (65 vs 55 out of 100) and 6005 welds better (very good vs good).

6005Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

6201Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

6005 vs 6201: properties

60056201

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
68.9 GPa10 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

270 MPa39.2 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

245 MPa35.5 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
4%

Shear Strength

172 MPa24.9 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in
29 MPa·√m26.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
100 HB

Hardness, Vickers

90 HV
—

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.69 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 607°C1,125 °F · Liquidus Temperature 654°C1,209 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

188 W/m·K109 BTU/hr·ft·°F
205 W/m·K118 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

897 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
895 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F
23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
393 J/g169 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
90°C194 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-80°C-112 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

49 % IACS
53 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.52×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.39 µΩ·in
3.25×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.28 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
68 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.83 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
65 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
—

Weldability

80 / 100
62 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

30%
20%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

100 kN·m/kg
123 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

435 kJ/m³
697 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

77.6 mm²/s
85.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

31
43

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.6 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale60056201

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60056201
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

6005 vs 6201 — frequently asked

Is 6201 stronger than 6005?

Yes. 6201 has a typical yield strength of 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 245 MPa (35.5 ksi) for 6005 — about 27% more. Tensile strength is 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 270 MPa (39.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6005 or 6201?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 6005 or 6201?

6201, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 55/100 for 6005; for welding the order is 6005 first (very good, 80/100) then 6201 (good, 62/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6005 and 6201 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.