FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6005 vs 6063

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6005 and 6063 are both aluminum grades, both multipurpose al. 6005 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 245 MPa (35.5 ksi) against 214 MPa (31 ksi) for 6063, about 14% more; tensile strength follows at 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) vs 241 MPa (35 ksi). 6005 is harder — 85 HB against 73 HB for 6063 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. On the shop floor, 6063 welds better (excellent vs very good) and 6063 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 6005 (standard, $$).

6005Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

6063Choose it when it will be welded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

6005 vs 6063: properties

60056063

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
68.9 GPa10 Msi

Shear Modulus

26 GPa3.8 Msi
25.8 GPa3.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

270 MPa39.2 ksi
241 MPa35 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

245 MPa35.5 ksi
214 MPa31 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
12%

Shear Strength

172 MPa24.9 ksi
152 MPa22 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
69 MPa10 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in
29 MPa·√m26.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
73 HB

Hardness, Vickers

90 HV
78 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

607°C1,125 °F
615°C1,139 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
655°C1,211 °F

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

188 W/m·K109 BTU/hr·ft·°F
200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

897 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
393 J/g169 BTU/lb

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

49 % IACS
53 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.52×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.39 µΩ·in
3.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.83 V · Corrosion Resistance 70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
200%

Weldability

80 / 100
90 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
75 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 55 / 100 · Formability (cold) 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

30%
35%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

100 kN·m/kg
89 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

435 kJ/m³
332 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

77.6 mm²/s
82.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

31
30

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale60056063

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60056063
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

6005 vs 6063 — frequently asked

Is 6005 stronger than 6063?

Yes. 6005 has a typical yield strength of 245 MPa (35.5 ksi) against 214 MPa (31 ksi) for 6063 — about 14% more. Tensile strength is 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) vs 241 MPa (35 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6005 or 6063?

6063 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 6005 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 6005 or 6063?

6063. Its weldability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (80/100) for 6005.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6005 and 6063 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.