FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6005 vs 6181

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6005 and 6181 are both aluminum grades, both multipurpose al. 6005 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 245 MPa (35.5 ksi) against 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) for 6181, about 88% more; tensile strength follows at 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) vs 240 MPa (34.8 ksi). In exchange, 6181 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 11% for 6005, and 6005 is harder (85 HB vs 70 HB). 6005 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous) and 6005 conducts heat better (188 W/m·K vs 165 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 6181 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 6005 (standard, $$).

6005Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

6181Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

6005 vs 6181: properties

60056181

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

270 MPa39.2 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

245 MPa35.5 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
25%

Shear Strength

172 MPa24.9 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
70 HB

Hardness, Vickers

90 HV
75 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 90 MPa13.1 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

607°C1,125 °F
585°C1,085 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

188 W/m·K109 BTU/hr·ft·°F
165 W/m·K95.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

897 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

49 % IACS
44 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.52×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.39 µΩ·in
3.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.54 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.74 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
—

Weldability

80 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

100 kN·m/kg
89 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

435 kJ/m³
122 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

77.6 mm²/s
67.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

31
25

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.6 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale60056181

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60056181
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

6005 vs 6181 — frequently asked

Is 6005 stronger than 6181?

Yes. 6005 has a typical yield strength of 245 MPa (35.5 ksi) against 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) for 6181 — about 88% more. Tensile strength is 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) vs 240 MPa (34.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6005 or 6181?

6181 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 6005 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 6005 or 6181?

6005. Its weldability rates very good (80/100) against very good (75/100) for 6181.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6005 and 6181 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.