FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6005 vs 6066

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6005 and 6066 are both aluminum grades. 6066 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 359 MPa (52.1 ksi) against 245 MPa (35.5 ksi) for 6005, about 47% more; tensile strength follows at 395 MPa (57.3 ksi) vs 270 MPa (39.2 ksi). 6066 is harder — 120 HB against 85 HB for 6005 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 6005 conducts heat better (188 W/m·K vs 147 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 6066 machines more easily (very good vs good), 6005 welds better (very good vs fair), and 6005 forms better (fair vs poor).

6005Choose it when it will be welded.

6066Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

6005 vs 6066: properties

60056066

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

270 MPa39.2 ksi
395 MPa57.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

245 MPa35.5 ksi
359 MPa52.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
12%

Shear Strength

172 MPa24.9 ksi
234 MPa33.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
120 HB

Hardness, Vickers

90 HV
126 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.72 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

607°C1,125 °F
563°C1,045 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
646°C1,195 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

188 W/m·K109 BTU/hr·ft·°F
147 W/m·K84.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

897 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F
23.2 µm/m·K12.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

49 % IACS
40 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.52×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.39 µΩ·in
4.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.82 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
72 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
—

Weldability

80 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

100 kN·m/kg
145 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
25.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

435 kJ/m³
934 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

77.6 mm²/s
60 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

31
36

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale60056066

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60056066
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

6005 vs 6066 — frequently asked

Is 6066 stronger than 6005?

Yes. 6066 has a typical yield strength of 359 MPa (52.1 ksi) against 245 MPa (35.5 ksi) for 6005 — about 47% more. Tensile strength is 395 MPa (57.3 ksi) vs 270 MPa (39.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6005 or 6066?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 6005 or 6066?

6066. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against good (55/100) for 6005; for welding the order is 6005 first (very good, 80/100) then 6066 (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6005 and 6066 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.