FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 5052 vs 5554

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 5052 and 5554 are both aluminum grades. 5052 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) for 5554, about 56% more. In exchange, 5554 is the more ductile: elongation 17% versus 12% for 5052. On the shop floor, 5052 machines more easily (50 vs 40 out of 100) and 5052 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 5554 (premium, $$$).

5052Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

5554Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

5052 vs 5554: properties

50525554

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

70.3 GPa10.2 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

25.9 GPa3.8 Msi
26.4 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
68 GPa9.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
255 MPa37 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

195 MPa28.3 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
17%

Shear Strength

138 MPa20 ksi
155 MPa22.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

117 MPa17 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

60 HB
62 HB

Hardness, Vickers

68 HV
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.69 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

607°C1,125 °F
602°C1,116 °F

Liquidus Temperature

649°C1,200 °F
646°C1,195 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

138 W/m·K79.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
134 W/m·K77.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F
23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-270°C-454 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 393 J/g169 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

35 % IACS
34 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.93×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.94 µΩ·in
5.1×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.01 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.85 V
-0.86 V

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
76 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
50%

Weldability

90 / 100
92 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

—
35 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 20 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

155 MJ/kg66,638 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

35%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

86 kN·m/kg
95 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
26 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

270 kJ/m³
112 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.5 mm²/s
55.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

19
21

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50525554

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50525554
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

5052 vs 5554 — frequently asked

Is 5052 stronger than 5554?

Yes. 5052 has a typical yield strength of 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) for 5554 — about 56% more. Tensile strength is 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) vs 255 MPa (37 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 5052 or 5554?

5052 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 5554 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 5052 or 5554?

5052, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 40/100 for 5554.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5052 and 5554 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.