FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 5052 vs 5082

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 5052 and 5082 are both aluminum grades. 5052 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for 5082, about 39% more. In exchange, 5082 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 12% for 5052, and 5082 is harder (66 HB vs 60 HB). 5052 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 65°C continuous) and 5052 conducts heat better (138 W/m·K vs 120 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 5052 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 5082 (standard, $$).

5052Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

5082Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

5052 vs 5082: properties

50525082

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

70.3 GPa10.2 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

25.9 GPa3.8 Msi
26.4 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

195 MPa28.3 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
20%

Shear Strength

138 MPa20 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

117 MPa17 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

60 HB
66 HB

Hardness, Vickers

68 HV
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
35 MPa·√m31.9 ksi·√in

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.65 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

607°C1,125 °F
577°C1,071 °F

Liquidus Temperature

649°C1,200 °F
638°C1,180 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

138 W/m·K79.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
120 W/m·K69.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F
24.2 µm/m·K13.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

393 J/g169 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
65°C149 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

35 % IACS
29 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.93×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.94 µΩ·in
5.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.32 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.85 V
-0.87 V

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
74 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
78 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30% · Brazeability / Solderability 20 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

155 MJ/kg66,638 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

86 kN·m/kg
104 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
26.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

270 kJ/m³
140 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.5 mm²/s
50.3 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 19

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50525082

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50525082
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

5052 vs 5082 — frequently asked

Is 5052 stronger than 5082?

Yes. 5052 has a typical yield strength of 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for 5082 — about 39% more. Tensile strength is 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 5052 or 5082?

5052 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 5082 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 5052 or 5082?

5052, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 45/100 for 5082.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5052 and 5082 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.