Aluminum 5019 vs 5052
Aluminum · grade comparison
Aluminum 5019 and 5052 are both aluminum grades. 5019 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) against 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) for 5052, about 18% more; tensile strength follows at 335 MPa (48.6 ksi) vs 230 MPa (33.4 ksi). 5019 is harder — 88 HB against 60 HB for 5052 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 5052 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 65°C continuous) and 5052 conducts heat better (138 W/m·K vs 113 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 5052 forms better (very good vs good) and 5052 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 5019 (standard, $$).
5019Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.
5052Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.
5019 vs 5052: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all aluminum grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all aluminum grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Vickers
Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Castability
Polishability
Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 20 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 35%
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | 5019 | 5052 |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$ Standard | $ Budget |
| Min. machined wall | 0.5 mm | 0.5 mm |
| Best machined surface | Ra 0.8 µm | Ra 0.8 µm |
Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.
5019 vs 5052 — frequently asked
Is 5019 stronger than 5052?
Yes. 5019 has a typical yield strength of 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) against 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) for 5052 — about 18% more. Tensile strength is 335 MPa (48.6 ksi) vs 230 MPa (33.4 ksi).
Which is cheaper, 5019 or 5052?
5052 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 5019 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.
Which is easier to machine, 5019 or 5052?
5052, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 45/100 for 5019; for welding the order is 5052 first (excellent, 90/100) then 5019 (excellent, 85/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5019 and 5052 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.