FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 5052 vs 5449

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 5052 and 5449 are both aluminum grades. 5052 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) for 5449, about 105% more; tensile strength follows at 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) vs 210 MPa (30.5 ksi). In exchange, 5449 is the more ductile: elongation 24% versus 12% for 5052, and 5052 is harder (60 HB vs 55 HB). On the shop floor, 5052 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and 5052 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 5449 (premium, $$$).

5052Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

5449Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

5052 vs 5449: properties

50525449

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

70.3 GPa10.2 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

25.9 GPa3.8 Msi
26.4 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

195 MPa28.3 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
24%

Shear Strength

138 MPa20 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

117 MPa17 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

60 HB
55 HB

Hardness, Vickers

68 HV
—

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

607°C1,125 °F
610°C1,130 °F

Liquidus Temperature

649°C1,200 °F
652°C1,206 °F

Same in both: Density 2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

138 W/m·K79.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
137 W/m·K79.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F
23.7 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

393 J/g169 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

35 % IACS
34 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.93×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.94 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
74 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.85 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
32 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
28%

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

—
30 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 90 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

155 MJ/kg66,638 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

86 kN·m/kg
78 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

270 kJ/m³
64 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.5 mm²/s
56.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

19
17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50525449

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50525449
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

5052 vs 5449 — frequently asked

Is 5052 stronger than 5449?

Yes. 5052 has a typical yield strength of 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) for 5449 — about 105% more. Tensile strength is 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) vs 210 MPa (30.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 5052 or 5449?

5052 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 5449 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 5052 or 5449?

5052. Its machinability rates fair (50/100) against poor (32/100) for 5449.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5052 and 5449 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.