FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 5005A vs 5052

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 5005A and 5052 are both aluminum grades. 5052 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) for 5005A, about 30% more; tensile strength follows at 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) vs 160 MPa (23.2 ksi). 5052 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 6% for 5005A, and 5052 is harder (60 HB vs 41 HB). 5005A conducts heat better (200 W/m·K vs 138 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 5052 machines more easily (50 vs 40 out of 100) and 5052 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 5005A (standard, $$).

5052Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

5005A vs 5052: properties

5005A5052

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69.5 GPa10.1 Msi
70.3 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

26 GPa3.8 Msi
25.9 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

68 GPa9.9 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

160 MPa23.2 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

150 MPa21.8 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

6%
12%

Shear Strength

97 MPa14.1 ksi
138 MPa20 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
117 MPa17 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

41 HB
60 HB

Hardness, Vickers

45 HV
68 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.69 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

632°C1,170 °F
607°C1,125 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
649°C1,200 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
138 W/m·K79.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.7 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F
23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
393 J/g169 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

52 % IACS
35 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.32×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.31 µΩ·in
4.93×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.94 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.85 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
50 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
30%

Weldability

88 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
75 / 100

Castability

30 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
155 MJ/kg66,638 BTU/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
86 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.8 MN·m/kg
26.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

162 kJ/m³
270 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

82.6 mm²/s
58.5 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 19

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50525005A

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability5005A5052
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

5005A vs 5052 — frequently asked

Is 5052 stronger than 5005A?

Yes. 5052 has a typical yield strength of 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) for 5005A — about 30% more. Tensile strength is 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) vs 160 MPa (23.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 5005A or 5052?

5052 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 5005A is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 5005A or 5052?

5052, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 40/100 for 5005A.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5005A and 5052 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.