FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 5005 vs 5051A

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 5005 and 5051A are both aluminum grades. 5005 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 138 MPa (20 ksi) against 68 MPa (9.86 ksi) for 5051A, about 103% more. In exchange, 5051A is the more ductile: elongation 24% versus 8% for 5005, and 5051A is harder (45 HB vs 41 HB). 5051A runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous) and 5005 conducts heat better (200 W/m·K vs 155 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 5005 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 5051A (standard, $$).

5005Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

5051AChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

5005 vs 5051A: properties

50055051A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

68.9 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

25.9 GPa3.8 Msi
26.4 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
68 GPa9.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

159 MPa23.1 ksi
175 MPa25.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

138 MPa20 ksi
68 MPa9.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
24%

Shear Strength

96 MPa13.9 ksi
115 MPa16.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

41 HB
45 HB

Hardness, Vickers

—
48 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

632°C1,170 °F
610°C1,130 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
652°C1,206 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
155 W/m·K89.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F
23.7 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-270°C-454 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

52 % IACS
35 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.3 µΩ·in
4.93×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.94 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.85 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
75 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
38 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
30%

Formability (cold)

72 / 100
92 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

72 / 100
75 / 100

Castability

—
30 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 88 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
65 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

138 kJ/m³
33 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

82.3 mm²/s
64.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

19
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50055051A

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50055051A
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

5005 vs 5051A — frequently asked

Is 5005 stronger than 5051A?

Yes. 5005 has a typical yield strength of 138 MPa (20 ksi) against 68 MPa (9.86 ksi) for 5051A — about 103% more. Tensile strength is 159 MPa (23.1 ksi) vs 175 MPa (25.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 5005 or 5051A?

5005 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 5051A is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 5005 or 5051A?

5005, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 38/100 for 5051A.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5005 and 5051A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.