FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 5005 vs 5026

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 5005 and 5026 are both aluminum grades. 5026 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) against 138 MPa (20 ksi) for 5005, about 23% more; tensile strength follows at 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 159 MPa (23.1 ksi). 5026 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 8% for 5005, and 5026 is harder (80 HB vs 41 HB). 5005 runs hotter in service (120°C vs 65°C continuous) and 5005 conducts heat better (200 W/m·K vs 117 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 5005 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 5026 (premium, $$$).

5005Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

5026Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

5005 vs 5026: properties

50055026

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

68.9 GPa10 Msi
70.5 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

25.9 GPa3.8 Msi
26.4 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

159 MPa23.1 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

138 MPa20 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
18%

Shear Strength

96 MPa13.9 ksi
185 MPa26.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

41 HB
80 HB

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
32 MPa·√m29.1 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

—
88 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.66 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

632°C1,170 °F
574°C1,065 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
638°C1,180 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
117 W/m·K67.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F
24.2 µm/m·K13.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
65°C149 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-270°C-454 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 397 J/g171 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

52 % IACS
29 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.3 µΩ·in
5.95×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.34 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.87 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
30%

Formability (cold)

72 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

72 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

—
30 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 45 / 100 · Weldability 88 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
117 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

138 kJ/m³
205 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

82.3 mm²/s
48.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

19
21

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50055026

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50055026
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

5005 vs 5026 — frequently asked

Is 5026 stronger than 5005?

Yes. 5026 has a typical yield strength of 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) against 138 MPa (20 ksi) for 5005 — about 23% more. Tensile strength is 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 159 MPa (23.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 5005 or 5026?

5005 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 5026 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose 5005 over 5026?

Pick 5005 when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor. Pick 5026 when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5005 and 5026 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.