FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 356 vs ZL401

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 356 and ZL401 are both aluminum grades. 356 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 186 MPa (27 ksi) against 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) for ZL401, about 6% more; tensile strength follows at 262 MPa (38 ksi) vs 220 MPa (31.9 ksi). 356 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 2% for ZL401, and ZL401 is harder (85 HB vs 80 HB). 356 is lighter (2.67 g/cm³ vs 2.95 g/cm³ for ZL401) and 356 conducts heat better (151 W/m·K vs 125 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 356 machines more easily (very good vs good), 356 welds better (very good vs poor), and 356 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than ZL401 (standard, $$).

356Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

356 vs ZL401: properties

356ZL401

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72.4 GPa10.5 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
26 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

262 MPa38 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

186 MPa27 ksi
175 MPa25.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
2%

Compressive Strength

190 MPa27.6 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Shear Strength

179 MPa26 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

5 J3.7 ft·lbf
4 J3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

80 HB
85 HB

Reduction in Area

—
3%

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
52 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
89 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.95 g/cm³0.11 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

557°C1,035 °F
545°C1,013 °F

Liquidus Temperature

613°C1,135 °F
610°C1,130 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
125 W/m·K72.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
24 µm/m·K13.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
380 J/g163 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

39 % IACS
33 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.9 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
43 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

120%
72%

Weldability

78 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
8 / 100

Castability

95 / 100
75 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
155 MJ/kg66,638 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
900 L/kg108 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

98 kN·m/kg
75 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.1 MN·m/kg
23.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

239 kJ/m³
219 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.7 mm²/s
48.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

25
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale356ZL401

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability356ZL401
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

356 vs ZL401 — frequently asked

Is 356 stronger than ZL401?

Yes. 356 has a typical yield strength of 186 MPa (27 ksi) against 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) for ZL401 — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 262 MPa (38 ksi) vs 220 MPa (31.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 356 or ZL401?

356 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while ZL401 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 356 or ZL401?

356. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (55/100) for ZL401; for welding the order is 356 first (very good, 78/100) then ZL401 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 356 and ZL401 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.