FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 356 vs ZL201A

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 356 and ZL201A are both aluminum grades. ZL201A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) against 186 MPa (27 ksi) for 356, about 53% more; tensile strength follows at 400 MPa (58 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi). ZL201A is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 5% for 356, and ZL201A is harder (100 HB vs 80 HB). 356 is lighter (2.67 g/cm³ vs 2.83 g/cm³ for ZL201A) and ZL201A runs hotter in service (250°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, 356 welds better (very good vs fair) and 356 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than ZL201A (premium, $$$).

356Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when it will be welded.

ZL201AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

356 vs ZL201A: properties

356ZL201A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72.4 GPa10.5 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

262 MPa38 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

186 MPa27 ksi
285 MPa41.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
10%

Compressive Strength

190 MPa27.6 ksi
295 MPa42.8 ksi

Shear Strength

179 MPa26 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
28 MPa·√m25.5 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

5 J3.7 ft·lbf
12 J8.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

80 HB
100 HB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.83 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

557°C1,035 °F
547°C1,017 °F

Liquidus Temperature

613°C1,135 °F
648°C1,198 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
22.5 µm/m·K12.5 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
250°C482 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

39 % IACS
32 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in
5.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.13 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.69 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
72 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

120%
300%

Weldability

78 / 100
35 / 100

Castability

95 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 10 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

60%
10%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

98 kN·m/kg
141 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.1 MN·m/kg
24.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

239 kJ/m³
580 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.7 mm²/s
52.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

25
33

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale356ZL201A

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability356ZL201A
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

356 vs ZL201A — frequently asked

Is ZL201A stronger than 356?

Yes. ZL201A has a typical yield strength of 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) against 186 MPa (27 ksi) for 356 — about 53% more. Tensile strength is 400 MPa (58 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 356 or ZL201A?

356 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while ZL201A is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 356 or ZL201A?

356. Its weldability rates very good (78/100) against fair (35/100) for ZL201A.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 356 and ZL201A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.