FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 356 vs ZL201

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 356 and ZL201 are both aluminum grades. ZL201 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 255 MPa (37 ksi) against 186 MPa (27 ksi) for 356, about 37% more; tensile strength follows at 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi). ZL201 is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 5% for 356, and ZL201 is harder (90 HB vs 80 HB). 356 is lighter (2.67 g/cm³ vs 2.83 g/cm³ for ZL201) and ZL201 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, 356 welds better (very good vs poor) and 356 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than ZL201 (standard, $$).

356Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when it will be welded.

ZL201Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

356 vs ZL201: properties

356ZL201

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72.4 GPa10.5 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
26 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

262 MPa38 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

186 MPa27 ksi
255 MPa37 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
6%

Compressive Strength

190 MPa27.6 ksi
270 MPa39.2 ksi

Shear Strength

179 MPa26 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
27 MPa·√m24.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

5 J3.7 ft·lbf
8 J5.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

80 HB
90 HB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 90 MPa13.1 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.83 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

557°C1,035 °F
545°C1,013 °F

Liquidus Temperature

613°C1,135 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
22.5 µm/m·K12.5 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

39 % IACS
33 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.68 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
75 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

120%
300%

Weldability

78 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

95 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 10 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
195 MJ/kg83,835 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

60%
15%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

98 kN·m/kg
124 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.1 MN·m/kg
24.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

239 kJ/m³
464 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.7 mm²/s
52.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

25
29

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale356ZL201

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability356ZL201
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

356 vs ZL201 — frequently asked

Is ZL201 stronger than 356?

Yes. ZL201 has a typical yield strength of 255 MPa (37 ksi) against 186 MPa (27 ksi) for 356 — about 37% more. Tensile strength is 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 356 or ZL201?

356 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while ZL201 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 356 or ZL201?

ZL201, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 75/100 against 70/100 for 356; for welding the order is 356 first (very good, 78/100) then ZL201 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 356 and ZL201 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.