FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 356 vs 707.0

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 356 and 707.0 are both aluminum grades. 356 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 262 MPa (38 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for 707.0, about 9% more. 356 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 2% for 707.0, and 356 is harder (80 HB vs 75 HB). 356 is lighter (2.67 g/cm³ vs 2.9 g/cm³ for 707.0) and 356 conducts heat better (151 W/m·K vs 130 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 356 welds better (very good vs fair) and 356 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 707.0 (premium, $$$).

356Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

356 vs 707.0: properties

356707.0

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72.4 GPa10.5 Msi
70.5 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

262 MPa38 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

186 MPa27 ksi
193 MPa28 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
2%

Compressive Strength

190 MPa27.6 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Shear Strength

179 MPa26 ksi
175 MPa25.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
83 MPa12 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

80 HB
75 HB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 5 J3.7 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.9 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

557°C1,035 °F
599°C1,110 °F

Liquidus Temperature

613°C1,135 °F
643°C1,189 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

39 % IACS
35 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in
4.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.93 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.85 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
78 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

120%
70%

Weldability

78 / 100
40 / 100

Castability

95 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 10 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

60%
40%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

98 kN·m/kg
83 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.1 MN·m/kg
24.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

239 kJ/m³
264 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.7 mm²/s
49.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

25
19

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale356707.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability356707.0
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

356 vs 707.0 — frequently asked

Is 356 stronger than 707.0?

Yes. 356 has a typical tensile strength of 262 MPa (38 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for 707.0 — about 9% more.

Which is cheaper, 356 or 707.0?

356 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 707.0 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 356 or 707.0?

707.0, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 78/100 against 70/100 for 356; for welding the order is 356 first (very good, 78/100) then 707.0 (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 356 and 707.0 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.