FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 356 vs 518.0

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 356 and 518.0 are both aluminum grades. 518.0 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 262 MPa (38 ksi) for 356, about 18% more. 518.0 is the more ductile: elongation 8% versus 5% for 356. 518.0 is lighter (2.57 g/cm³ vs 2.67 g/cm³ for 356) and 356 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous). On the shop floor, 518.0 machines more easily (80 vs 70 out of 100), 356 welds better (very good vs fair), and 356 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 518.0 (standard, $$).

356Choose it when the part sees heat, or when it will be welded.

518.0Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

356 vs 518.0: properties

356518.0

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72.4 GPa10.5 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
26 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
68 GPa9.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

262 MPa38 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

186 MPa27 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
8%

Shear Strength

179 MPa26 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
138 MPa20 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

5 J3.7 ft·lbf
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Compressive Strength 190 MPa27.6 ksi · Hardness, Brinell 80 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.57 g/cm³0.09 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

557°C1,035 °F
535°C995 °F

Liquidus Temperature

613°C1,135 °F
621°C1,150 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
96 W/m·K55.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
24.1 µm/m·K13.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

39 % IACS
24 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.83 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.87 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

120%
160%

Weldability

78 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

95 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
88 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

60%
55%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

98 kN·m/kg
121 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.1 MN·m/kg
27.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

239 kJ/m³
258 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.7 mm²/s
38.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

25
18

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale356518.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability356518.0
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

356 vs 518.0 — frequently asked

Is 518.0 stronger than 356?

Yes. 518.0 has a typical tensile strength of 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 262 MPa (38 ksi) for 356 — about 18% more.

Which is cheaper, 356 or 518.0?

356 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 518.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 356 or 518.0?

518.0, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 80/100 against 70/100 for 356; for welding the order is 356 first (very good, 78/100) then 518.0 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 356 and 518.0 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.