FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 355 vs ZL204A

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 355 and ZL204A are both aluminum grades. ZL204A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355, about 83% more; tensile strength follows at 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi). ZL204A is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 3% for 355, and ZL204A is harder (110 HB vs 85 HB). 355 is lighter (2.71 g/cm³ vs 2.81 g/cm³ for ZL204A) and ZL204A runs hotter in service (250°C vs 175°C continuous). On the shop floor, 355 welds better (good vs poor) and 355 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than ZL204A (premium, $$$).

355Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when it will be welded.

ZL204AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

355 vs ZL204A: properties

355ZL204A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
6%

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
24 MPa·√m21.8 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
110 HB

Compressive Strength

—
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26.5 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.81 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

546°C1,015 °F
545°C1,013 °F

Liquidus Temperature

621°C1,150 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F
22.6 µm/m·K12.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
250°C482 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

36 % IACS
32 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in
5.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.13 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.72 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
33 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
68 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
160%

Weldability

55 / 100
22 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 5 / 100 · Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

80%
10%

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

92 kN·m/kg
167 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
24.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

228 kJ/m³
778 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

57.9 mm²/s
52.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
39

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355ZL204A

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability355ZL204A
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

355 vs ZL204A — frequently asked

Is ZL204A stronger than 355?

Yes. ZL204A has a typical yield strength of 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355 — about 83% more. Tensile strength is 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 355 or ZL204A?

355 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while ZL204A is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 355 or ZL204A?

ZL204A, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 68/100 against 62/100 for 355; for welding the order is 355 first (good, 55/100) then ZL204A (poor, 22/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 355 and ZL204A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.