FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 355 vs ZL111

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 355 and ZL111 are both aluminum grades. ZL111 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355, about 39% more; tensile strength follows at 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi). In exchange, 355 is the more ductile: elongation 3% versus 2.5% for ZL111, and ZL111 is harder (100 HB vs 85 HB). 355 runs hotter in service (175°C vs 150°C continuous) and 355 conducts electricity better (36 % IACS vs 32 % IACS). On the shop floor, 355 welds better (good vs fair) and 355 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than ZL111 (standard, $$).

355Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

ZL111Choose it when strength drives the design.

355 vs ZL111: properties

355ZL111

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
2.5%

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
100 HB

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.73 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

546°C1,015 °F
525°C977 °F

Liquidus Temperature

621°C1,150 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
138 W/m·K79.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F
21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
430 J/g185 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-70°C-94 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

36 % IACS
32 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in
5.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.13 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
42 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.78 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 60% · Castability 85 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

80%
60%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

92 kN·m/kg
121 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
26.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

228 kJ/m³
434 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

57.9 mm²/s
52.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
29

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355ZL111

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability355ZL111
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

355 vs ZL111 — frequently asked

Is ZL111 stronger than 355?

Yes. ZL111 has a typical yield strength of 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355 — about 39% more. Tensile strength is 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 355 or ZL111?

355 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while ZL111 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 355 or ZL111?

355, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 62/100 against 55/100 for ZL111; for welding the order is 355 first (good, 55/100) then ZL111 (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 355 and ZL111 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.