FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 355 vs ZL109

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 355 and ZL109 are both aluminum grades. ZL109 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 225 MPa (32.6 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355, about 25% more; tensile strength follows at 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi). In exchange, 355 is the more ductile: elongation 3% versus 0.8% for ZL109, and ZL109 is harder (115 HB vs 85 HB). ZL109 is stiffer (80 GPa vs 71 GPa) and ZL109 runs hotter in service (250°C vs 175°C continuous). On the shop floor, 355 machines more easily (good vs fair), 355 welds better (good vs poor), and 355 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than ZL109 (standard, $$).

355Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

ZL109Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

355 vs ZL109: properties

355ZL109

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
30 GPa4.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
265 MPa38.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
225 MPa32.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
0.8%

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
115 HB

Hardness, Vickers

—
120 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Shear Strength 195 MPa28.3 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

546°C1,015 °F
525°C977 °F

Liquidus Temperature

621°C1,150 °F
575°C1,067 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
125 W/m·K72.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F
19.5 µm/m·K10.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
490 J/g211 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
250°C482 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

36 % IACS
27 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in
6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.78 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
—

Weldability

55 / 100
30 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
90 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
10.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

80%
35%

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

92 kN·m/kg
99 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
29.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

228 kJ/m³
316 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

57.9 mm²/s
53 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
21

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355ZL109

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability355ZL109
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

355 vs ZL109 — frequently asked

Is ZL109 stronger than 355?

Yes. ZL109 has a typical yield strength of 225 MPa (32.6 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355 — about 25% more. Tensile strength is 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 355 or ZL109?

355 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while ZL109 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 355 or ZL109?

355. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against fair (45/100) for ZL109; for welding the order is 355 first (good, 55/100) then ZL109 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 355 and ZL109 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.