FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 355 vs LM25

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 355 and LM25 are both aluminum grades, both cast al. LM25 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 215 MPa (31.2 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355, about 19% more. LM25 is harder — 95 HB against 85 HB for 355 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 355 runs hotter in service (175°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, LM25 welds better (very good vs good) and 355 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than LM25 (standard, $$).

355Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

LM25Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

355 vs LM25: properties

355LM25

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
22 MPa·√m20 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
95 HB

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
4 J3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Vickers

—
100 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Shear Modulus 26.5 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 250 MPa36.3 ksi · Elongation at Break 3%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

546°C1,015 °F
555°C1,031 °F

Liquidus Temperature

621°C1,150 °F
615°C1,139 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F
22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

36 % IACS
39 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in
4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
65 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
65 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
70%

Weldability

55 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
190 MJ/kg81,685 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

80%
50%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

92 kN·m/kg
93 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
26.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

228 kJ/m³
326 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

57.9 mm²/s
58.5 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 24

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355LM25

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability355LM25
Default condition—T6
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

355 vs LM25 — frequently asked

Is LM25 stronger than 355?

Yes. LM25 has a typical yield strength of 215 MPa (31.2 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355 — about 19% more. Tensile strength is 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 355 or LM25?

355 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while LM25 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 355 or LM25?

LM25. Its weldability rates very good (75/100) against good (55/100) for 355.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 355 and LM25 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.