FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 355 vs LM20

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 355 and LM20 are both aluminum grades. 355 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 135 MPa (19.6 ksi) for LM20, about 33% more. 355 is harder — 85 HB against 78 HB for LM20 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 355 runs hotter in service (175°C vs 150°C continuous) and 355 conducts heat better (151 W/m·K vs 121 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 355 machines more easily (good vs fair) and 355 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than LM20 (standard, $$).

355Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

355 vs LM20: properties

355LM20

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
135 MPa19.6 ksi

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
16 MPa·√m14.6 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
78 HB

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Shear Modulus 26.5 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 3%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.66 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

546°C1,015 °F
574°C1,065 °F

Liquidus Temperature

621°C1,150 °F
582°C1,080 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
121 W/m·K69.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F
20.4 µm/m·K11.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
515 J/g221 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

36 % IACS
31 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in
5.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
40%

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

80%
85%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

92 kN·m/kg
98 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
26.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

228 kJ/m³
128 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

57.9 mm²/s
47.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
22

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355LM20

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability355LM20
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

355 vs LM20 — frequently asked

Is 355 stronger than LM20?

Yes. 355 has a typical yield strength of 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 135 MPa (19.6 ksi) for LM20 — about 33% more. Tensile strength is 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) vs 260 MPa (37.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 355 or LM20?

355 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while LM20 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 355 or LM20?

355. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against fair (35/100) for LM20.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 355 and LM20 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.