FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 355 vs A535.0

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 355 and A535.0 are both aluminum grades. 355 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) for A535.0, about 44% more. In exchange, A535.0 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 3% for 355, and 355 is harder (85 HB vs 65 HB). A535.0 is lighter (2.62 g/cm³ vs 2.71 g/cm³ for 355) and 355 runs hotter in service (175°C vs 120°C continuous). On the shop floor, A535.0 machines more easily (excellent vs good), A535.0 welds better (very good vs good), and 355 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than A535.0 (premium, $$$).

355Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

A535.0Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

355 vs A535.0: properties

355A535.0

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
26 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
12%

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
65 HB

Compressive Strength

—
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.62 g/cm³0.09 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

546°C1,015 °F
549°C1,020 °F

Liquidus Temperature

621°C1,150 °F
632°C1,170 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
96 W/m·K55.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F
24.5 µm/m·K13.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

36 % IACS
23 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in
7.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.95 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.87 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
88 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
110%

Weldability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
90 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

80%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

92 kN·m/kg
105 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
26.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

228 kJ/m³
112 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

57.9 mm²/s
40.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
15

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355A535.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability355A535.0
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

355 vs A535.0 — frequently asked

Is 355 stronger than A535.0?

Yes. 355 has a typical yield strength of 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) for A535.0 — about 44% more. Tensile strength is 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 355 or A535.0?

355 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while A535.0 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 355 or A535.0?

A535.0. Its machinability rates excellent (88/100) against good (62/100) for 355; for welding the order is A535.0 first (very good, 70/100) then 355 (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 355 and A535.0 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.