FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 355 vs A413

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 355 and A413 are both aluminum grades, both cast al. 355 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) for A413, about 38% more. In exchange, A413 is the more ductile: elongation 3.5% versus 3% for 355, and 355 is harder (85 HB vs 80 HB). 355 runs hotter in service (175°C vs 150°C continuous) and 355 conducts heat better (151 W/m·K vs 121 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 355 machines more easily (good vs fair) and 355 welds better (good vs fair).

355Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

A413Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

355 vs A413: properties

355A413

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
3.5%

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
17 MPa·√m15.5 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
80 HB

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Vickers

—
85 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Shear Modulus 26.5 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.66 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

546°C1,015 °F
574°C1,065 °F

Liquidus Temperature

621°C1,150 °F
582°C1,080 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
121 W/m·K69.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F
20.4 µm/m·K11.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

36 % IACS
31 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in
5.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
30%

Weldability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
95 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 25 / 100 · Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

80%
85%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

92 kN·m/kg
109 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
26.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

228 kJ/m³
119 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

57.9 mm²/s
47.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 24

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355A413

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability355A413
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

355 vs A413 — frequently asked

Is 355 stronger than A413?

Yes. 355 has a typical yield strength of 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) for A413 — about 38% more. Tensile strength is 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) vs 290 MPa (42.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 355 or A413?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 355 or A413?

355. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against fair (40/100) for A413; for welding the order is 355 first (good, 55/100) then A413 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 355 and A413 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.