FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 319 vs A413

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 319 and A413 are both aluminum grades, both cast al. A413 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) against 186 MPa (27 ksi) for 319, about 56% more. A413 is the more ductile: elongation 3.5% versus 2% for 319, and A413 is harder (80 HB vs 70 HB). A413 is lighter (2.66 g/cm³ vs 2.79 g/cm³ for 319) and 319 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, 319 machines more easily (very good vs fair) and 319 welds better (good vs fair).

319Choose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

A413Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

319 vs A413: properties

319A413

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

186 MPa27 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
3.5%

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

69 MPa10 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in
17 MPa·√m15.5 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
80 HB

Hardness, Vickers

—
85 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.66 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
574°C1,065 °F

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
582°C1,080 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F
121 W/m·K69.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
20.4 µm/m·K11.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
31 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
5.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
30%

Weldability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
95 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

75%
85%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
109 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
26.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

104 kJ/m³
119 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.6 mm²/s
47.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
24

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319A413

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability319A413
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

319 vs A413 — frequently asked

Is A413 stronger than 319?

Yes. A413 has a typical tensile strength of 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) against 186 MPa (27 ksi) for 319 — about 56% more.

Which is cheaper, 319 or A413?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 319 or A413?

319. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against fair (40/100) for A413; for welding the order is 319 first (good, 55/100) then A413 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 319 and A413 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.