FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 355 vs 712

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 355 and 712 are both aluminum grades, both cast al. Both yield at about 180 MPa — strength does not separate them. 712 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 3% for 355, and 355 is harder (85 HB vs 75 HB). 355 is lighter (2.71 g/cm³ vs 2.81 g/cm³ for 712) and 355 runs hotter in service (175°C vs 120°C continuous). On the shop floor, 712 machines more easily (very good vs good).

355Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

712Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

355 vs 712: properties

355712

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
172 MPa24.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
5%

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
75 HB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.81 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

546°C1,015 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Liquidus Temperature

621°C1,150 °F
640°C1,184 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
159 W/m·K91.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F
23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

36 % IACS
40 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in
4.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.95 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
72 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
—

Weldability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
—

Castability

85 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
195 MJ/kg83,835 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

80%
50%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

92 kN·m/kg
85 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
25.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

228 kJ/m³
208 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

57.9 mm²/s
58.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
23

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355712

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability355712
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

355 vs 712 — frequently asked

What is the difference between 355 and 712?

Aluminum 355 and 712 are both aluminum grades, both cast al. Both yield at about 180 MPa — strength does not separate them. 712 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 3% for 355, and 355 is harder (85 HB vs 75 HB).

Which is cheaper, 355 or 712?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 355 or 712?

712. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against good (62/100) for 355; for welding the order is 712 first (good, 60/100) then 355 (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 355 and 712 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.