FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 319 vs 712

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 319 and 712 are both aluminum grades, both cast al. 712 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 172 MPa (24.9 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319, about 39% more; tensile strength follows at 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi). 712 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 2% for 319, and 712 is harder (75 HB vs 70 HB). 319 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 120°C continuous) and 712 conducts heat better (159 W/m·K vs 109 W/m·K).

319Choose it when the part sees heat.

712Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

319 vs 712: properties

319712

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

186 MPa27 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
172 MPa24.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
5%

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

69 MPa10 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
75 HB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.81 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
640°C1,184 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F
159 W/m·K91.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
40 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
4.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.95 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
—

Weldability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
—

Castability

90 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
50 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 72 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
195 MJ/kg83,835 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
50%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
85 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
25.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

104 kJ/m³
208 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.6 mm²/s
58.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
23

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319712

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability319712
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

319 vs 712 — frequently asked

Is 712 stronger than 319?

Yes. 712 has a typical yield strength of 172 MPa (24.9 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319 — about 39% more. Tensile strength is 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 319 or 712?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 319 or 712?

712. Its weldability rates good (60/100) against good (55/100) for 319.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 319 and 712 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.