FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 336.0 vs 355

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 336.0 and 355 are both aluminum grades. 336.0 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 193 MPa (28 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355, about 7% more. In exchange, 355 is the more ductile: elongation 3% versus 0.5% for 336.0, and 336.0 is harder (105 HB vs 85 HB). 336.0 is stiffer (90 GPa vs 71 GPa) and 336.0 runs hotter in service (250°C vs 175°C continuous). On the shop floor, 355 machines more easily (good vs fair), 355 welds better (good vs fair), and 355 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 336.0 (standard, $$).

336.0Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

355Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

336.0 vs 355: properties

336.0355

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

90 GPa13.1 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

34 GPa4.9 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

248 MPa36 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

193 MPa28 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.5%
3%

Shear Strength

193 MPa28 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

103 MPa14.9 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

14 MPa·√m12.7 ksi·√in
20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

2 J1.5 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

105 HB
85 HB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.72 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

538°C1,000 °F
546°C1,015 °F

Liquidus Temperature

566°C1,051 °F
621°C1,150 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

117 W/m·K67.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

19 µm/m·K10.6 µin/in·°F
22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

480 J/g206 BTU/lb
389 J/g167 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
175°C347 °F

Min Service Temperature

-195°C-319 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

29 % IACS
36 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.32 µΩ·in
4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.79 V
-0.78 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
62 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
60%

Weldability

35 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

78 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

15 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

9.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

55%
80%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

91 kN·m/kg
92 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

33.1 MN·m/kg
26.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

207 kJ/m³
228 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

44.7 mm²/s
57.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
24

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355336.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability336.0355
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

336.0 vs 355 — frequently asked

Is 336.0 stronger than 355?

Yes. 336.0 has a typical yield strength of 193 MPa (28 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355 — about 7% more. Tensile strength is 248 MPa (36 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 336.0 or 355?

355 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 336.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 336.0 or 355?

355. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against fair (35/100) for 336.0; for welding the order is 355 first (good, 55/100) then 336.0 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 336.0 and 355 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.