FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 333.0 vs 355

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 333.0 and 355 are both aluminum grades. 355 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 131 MPa (19 ksi) for 333.0, about 37% more; tensile strength follows at 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi). 355 is the more ductile: elongation 3% versus 2% for 333.0, and 333.0 is harder (90 HB vs 85 HB). 355 runs hotter in service (175°C vs 150°C continuous) and 355 conducts heat better (151 W/m·K vs 100 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 355 welds better (good vs fair) and 355 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 333.0 (standard, $$).

355Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

333.0 vs 355: properties

333.0355

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

131 MPa19 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
3%

Shear Strength

179 MPa26 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in
20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

3 J2.2 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

90 HB
85 HB

Hardness, Vickers

95 HV
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.77 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
546°C1,015 °F

Liquidus Temperature

585°C1,085 °F
621°C1,150 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

100 W/m·K57.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F
22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
175°C347 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

26 % IACS
36 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.6 µΩ·in
4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

42 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.78 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
62 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

65%
60%

Weldability

35 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

8 / 100
5 / 100

Castability

88 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

70%
80%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

84 kN·m/kg
92 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26 MN·m/kg
26.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

119 kJ/m³
228 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

37.5 mm²/s
57.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
24

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355333.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability333.0355
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

333.0 vs 355 — frequently asked

Is 355 stronger than 333.0?

Yes. 355 has a typical yield strength of 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 131 MPa (19 ksi) for 333.0 — about 37% more. Tensile strength is 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 333.0 or 355?

355 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 333.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 333.0 or 355?

355. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against fair (35/100) for 333.0.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 333.0 and 355 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.