FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 332.0 vs 356

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 332.0 and 356 are both aluminum grades. 356 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 262 MPa (38 ksi) against 248 MPa (36 ksi) for 332.0, about 6% more. 356 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 1% for 332.0, and 332.0 is harder (105 HB vs 80 HB). 356 is lighter (2.67 g/cm³ vs 2.76 g/cm³ for 332.0) and 332.0 runs hotter in service (250°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, 356 machines more easily (very good vs good), 356 welds better (very good vs poor), and 356 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 332.0 (standard, $$).

332.0Choose it when the part sees heat.

356Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

332.0 vs 356: properties

332.0356

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
72.4 GPa10.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

28 GPa4.1 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

75 GPa10.9 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

248 MPa36 ksi
262 MPa38 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

193 MPa28 ksi
186 MPa27 ksi

Elongation at Break

1%
5%

Compressive Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Shear Strength

193 MPa28 ksi
179 MPa26 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in
20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

105 HB
80 HB

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
5 J3.7 ft·lbf

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.76 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
557°C1,035 °F

Liquidus Temperature

582°C1,080 °F
613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

104 W/m·K60.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.6 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F
21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-195°C-319 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

26 % IACS
39 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.6 µΩ·in
4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.79 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Weldability

25 / 100
78 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

15 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
120%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.5 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

90 kN·m/kg
98 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.5 MN·m/kg
27.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

245 kJ/m³
239 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

39.1 mm²/s
58.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale356332.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability332.0356
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

332.0 vs 356 — frequently asked

Is 356 stronger than 332.0?

Yes. 356 has a typical tensile strength of 262 MPa (38 ksi) against 248 MPa (36 ksi) for 332.0 — about 6% more.

Which is cheaper, 332.0 or 356?

356 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 332.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 332.0 or 356?

356. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (55/100) for 332.0; for welding the order is 356 first (very good, 78/100) then 332.0 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 332.0 and 356 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.