FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 332.0 vs 355

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 332.0 and 355 are both aluminum grades. 332.0 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 193 MPa (28 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355, about 7% more. In exchange, 355 is the more ductile: elongation 3% versus 1% for 332.0, and 332.0 is harder (105 HB vs 85 HB). 332.0 is stiffer (76 GPa vs 71 GPa) and 332.0 runs hotter in service (250°C vs 175°C continuous). On the shop floor, 355 welds better (good vs poor) and 355 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 332.0 (standard, $$).

332.0Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

355Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

332.0 vs 355: properties

332.0355

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

28 GPa4.1 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

75 GPa10.9 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

248 MPa36 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

193 MPa28 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

1%
3%

Compressive Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
—

Shear Strength

193 MPa28 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in
20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

105 HB
85 HB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 62 MPa9 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.76 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
546°C1,015 °F

Liquidus Temperature

582°C1,080 °F
621°C1,150 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

104 W/m·K60.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.6 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F
22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
175°C347 °F

Min Service Temperature

-195°C-319 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

26 % IACS
36 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.6 µΩ·in
4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.79 V
-0.78 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
62 / 100

Weldability

25 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

15 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
60%

Same in both: Formability (cold) 5 / 100 · Castability 85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
80%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

90 kN·m/kg
92 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.5 MN·m/kg
26.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

245 kJ/m³
228 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

39.1 mm²/s
57.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
24

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355332.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability332.0355
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

332.0 vs 355 — frequently asked

Is 332.0 stronger than 355?

Yes. 332.0 has a typical yield strength of 193 MPa (28 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355 — about 7% more. Tensile strength is 248 MPa (36 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 332.0 or 355?

355 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 332.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 332.0 or 355?

355, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 62/100 against 55/100 for 332.0; for welding the order is 355 first (good, 55/100) then 332.0 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 332.0 and 355 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.